--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 12:10 ---
Fixed on trunk, thanks for the report!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 11:58 ---
Subject: Bug 43173
Author: pault
Date: Tue Mar 2 11:58:02 2010
New Revision: 157163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157163
Log:
2010-03-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/43180
* tr
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 10:01 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Completely untested patch:
Still untested, but I think it might lead to wrong code with either
allocatable(1)%pointer(1:2) ! Potentially non-contiguous
or
pointer%allocatable(1:2) ! Ca
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 09:24 ---
Completely untested patch:
--- trans-array.c (revision 157160)
+++ trans-array.c (working copy)
@@ -,5 +,5 @@ gfc_conv_array_parameter (gfc_se * se, g
no_pack = ((sym && sym->as
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 09:16 ---
> I do not see the temporaries with [...] 4.5.0 20100214
> but I see this with [...]4.5.0 20100227
I think the "regression" is due to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=156926
Namely
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 11:54 ---
Not a regression (we track regressions only against releases). I see both
temporaries also on the 4.4 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-26 16:06 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > by chance local changes which fix this issue?
> I will go back and confirm that the tree on my machine at work is clean.
No, it wasn't, so my comment was incorrect.
Cheers
Paul
--
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-26 05:28 ---
> The warning for -Warray-temporaries is shown here for both -m32 and -m64 --
> and
> I also see "_gfortran_internal_pack" in the -fdump-tree-original. Do you have
> by chance local changes which fix this issue?
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 12:56 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This does not occur on i386. I will try on a x86_64 tonight.
The warning for -Warray-temporaries is shown here for both -m32 and -m64 -- and
I also see "_gfortran_internal_pack" in the -fd
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 12:48 ---
This does not occur on i386. I will try on a x86_64 tonight.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43173
10 matches
Mail list logo
