--- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-03-13 17:26 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Wrong-code due to missing
array temp for DT with pointer component
HJ,
Thanks for doing all this backporting of the testcases.
As it happens, I have been leav
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-13 16:52 ---
gfortran.dg/internal_pack_12.f90 failed with gcc 4.4 branch
as of 2010-03-13. Is this a regression on 4.4 branch?
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 17:53 ---
Fixed on trunk and yes, thanks for the report!
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 17:50 ---
Subject: Bug 43243
Author: pault
Date: Wed Mar 3 17:49:53 2010
New Revision: 157199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157199
Log:
2010-03-03 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/43243
* tra
--- Comment #5 from burnus at net-b dot de 2010-03-03 16:59 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Missing array temp for DT
with pointer component
On 03/03/2010 04:53 PM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Yet another in the series :-) I hope that it is the last...
>
So do I - espe
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-03-03 16:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Wrong-code due to missing
array temp for DT with pointer component
Tobias,
Don't worry, I got it:-)
The patch fixes both problems.
Cheers
Paul
On Wed, Mar
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 15:53 ---
As it might have not been completely clear from comment 0:
type t
[...]
integer, pointer :: b(:)
end type
type(t) :: y
y%b => z(::2)
call bar(y%b) ! <<< WRONG-CODE: Here a temporary is missing
With
