[Bug fortran/43244] statement misinterpreted as FINAL declaration

2010-03-03 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 09:54 --- (In reply to comment #0) > With so many compilers rejecting it, I wonder: Is it actually legal? I guess not. Changing the line in question to finalstate(1,1:2)%ID = (/1,103/) makes all compilers accept it (including

[Bug fortran/43244] statement misinterpreted as FINAL declaration

2010-03-03 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 09:49 --- IIRC the parsing of FINAL declarations was implemented by Daniel Kraft. It was committed as r136293. Daniel, could you have a look at this bug? -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed