http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
Andrew Benson abenson at caltech dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abenson at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:48:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 26628
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26628
Small patch for the resolve.c. It misses all the real work (trans*.c).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06
10:24:24 UTC ---
As litmus test: BT_CLASS version of PR 50981: Passing an
unallocated/unassociated [or absent + nonpointer/nonallocatable] BT_CLASS
variable or a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-22
12:08:28 UTC ---
Regarding the LHS (in addition to comment 6):
- It may not be coindexed (!gfc_is_conindexed(e))
- It may not be a coarray (!gfc_expr_attr (e).codimension)
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
19:38:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
The following patch makes the test case in comment #3 work correctly:
I think your current patch only works if declared type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-10 22:56:21 UTC ---
Stupid question, but shouldn't it be possible to replace the call to
'is_scalar_reallocatable_lhs' by a check for the allocatable attribute?
Index:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-04 09:32:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Realloc-on-assign for scalars was implemented in r169356.
Paul, what does it take to make this work for polymorphic scalars?
Not a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-03 20:45:04 UTC ---
Test case:
type :: t
integer :: i
end type
class(t), allocatable :: x
type(t) :: y = t (3)
x = y
print *,x%i
end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-03 20:56:10 UTC ---
Here is a simple patch for getting rid of the error message:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-03
21:24:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Here is a simple patch for getting rid of the error message:
The patch is not quite right. The LHS must be allocatable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-03
21:28:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Here is a simple patch for getting rid of the error message:
The patch is not quite right. The LHS must be allocatable and it must
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-03
21:29:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Stupid firefox - it somehow must have submitted a draft. Ignore comment 6 and
look at comment 7.
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-03 11:23 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
note that realloc on assignment must be supported to get this working properly
... which is PR35810.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-14 14:01 ---
See Variable must not be polymorphic in assignment in resolve.c and note that
realloc on assignment must be supported to get this working properly (might
already work for derived types).
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
