[Bug fortran/43685] libgfortran: Consider using __int128

2010-06-09 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 12:01 --- I don't understand what you mean by that: currently, we have the following typedefs on platforms which support a 128-bit int type: typedef __int128_t GFC_INTEGER_16; typedef __uint128_t GFC_UINTEGER_16; I

[Bug fortran/43685] libgfortran: Consider using __int128

2010-06-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 12:41 --- Close as WONTFIX. The int128 changes still do not offer to enter the integer directly (instead of using 123L with shifts) And one issue was fixed as part of