--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 11:33 ---
Please update your gfortran.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42866 ***
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-16 05:54 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I tried this test case gfortran 4.6.0 (current trunk) and i do not get an ICE.
> It just works. ???
Same here:
gcc version 4.4.0 20090206 -- ICE
gcc version 4.5.0 20100409 -- works
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-15 22:55
---
I tried this test case gfortran 4.6.0 (current trunk) and i do not get an ICE.
It just works. ???
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43712
--- Comment #2 from longb at cray dot com 2010-04-09 22:20 ---
OK, no need to worry about the simple.f90 case. The original test.f90 problem
is the only issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43712
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-09 21:40
---
Try using -std=f90 with and without -pedantic. gfortran allows the missing
ampersand as an extension.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43712
