--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-14 13:26 ---
After revision 158291 I get
[macbook] f90/bug% time gfc pr19925_1.f90
pr19925_1.f90:2.27:
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: I(N)=(/(MOD(K,2),K=1,N)/)
1
Error: The number of elements in the array cons
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 05:27
---
Subject: Bug 43747
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Apr 14 05:27:29 2010
New Revision: 158291
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158291
Log:
2010-04-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/43747
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 05:17
---
Subject: Bug 43747
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Apr 14 05:16:59 2010
New Revision: 158290
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158290
Log:
2010-04-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/43747
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 05:08
---
Easier then I thought. Patch submitted for approval.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43747
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 01:32
---
OK, I see it now. This is a little different from our previous encounters with
overly big constructors. In fact, the code we had in place is still there, so
we have whacked something. The test case does not fail
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 20:56 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't see the failure on linux-x86-64. I am building on Cygwin to see whta
> shows up there. I seem to recall a patch that changed a fatal error to a
> non-fatal somewhere. I will have a
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 19:03
---
I don't see the failure on linux-x86-64. I am building on Cygwin to see whta
shows up there. I seem to recall a patch that changed a fatal error to a
non-fatal somewhere. I will have a look tonight.
--
http