[Bug fortran/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

2010-04-20 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #9 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-04-20 17:53 --- yawn valid testcase here ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cp2k/cp2k.tar.gz -- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

2010-04-20 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 18:01 --- The submitted testcase is invalid. See R729. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

2010-04-20 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug fortran/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

2010-04-20 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 20:44 --- I have a patch that prevents the ICE on the invalid code in comment #1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43793

[Bug fortran/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

2010-04-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 03:14 --- It was introduced by: 2010-04-15 Steven G. Kargl ka...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/30073 * trans-array.c (gfc_trans_array_bound_check): Eliminate a redundant block of code. Set name to the