http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44232
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44232
--- Comment #14 from tlcclt 2010-12-29
16:30:31 UTC ---
Sorry - yes. This bug report can be closed.I did eventually
install a more recent version of the compiler and verified that the
problem was not present. Had long forgotten about t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44232
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #12 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-06 09:05
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Hmm. I've now built gfortran 4.5.1 20100521 (from the branch) and still have
> the same internal compiler error.
I have gcc 4.5.1 20100506 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.3.0, and it compil
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-22 10:04 ---
> I may end up doing that, but since part of my interest is in F2003
> functionality, moving backwards in terms of versions is not a win-
> win. Unfortunately, I probably will have to work with 2 versions for
--- Comment #10 from Thomas dot L dot Clune at nasa dot gov 2010-05-22
01:59 ---
Subject: Re: function result with pointer to strided component of argument
To be honest I'm very rusty at building gcc. (Remember doing it
almost daily 10-15 years ago, but generally use commercial co
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 01:34 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Hmm. I've now built gfortran 4.5.1 20100521 (from the branch) and still have
> the same internal compiler error. Are you certain that the 4.5.1 20100420
> version does not have this probl
--- Comment #8 from Thomas dot L dot Clune at nasa dot gov 2010-05-22
00:59 ---
Hmm. I've now built gfortran 4.5.1 20100521 (from the branch) and still have
the same internal compiler error. Are you certain that the 4.5.1 20100420
version does not have this problem?
(In reply to
--- Comment #7 from Thomas dot L dot Clune at nasa dot gov 2010-05-22
00:44 ---
Subject: Re: function result with pointer to strided component of argument
I may end up doing that, but since part of my interest is in F2003
functionality, moving backwards in terms of versions is not a
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-21 21:04 ---
Why don't you use fink (http://finkproject.org/ 4.4.2 works for your test) or
macport?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44232
--- Comment #5 from Thomas dot L dot Clune at nasa dot gov 2010-05-21
20:49 ---
Subject: Re: function result with pointer to strided component of argument
Alas, my primary development platform is Mac OS X, and no more recent
binaries are available. I'm in the process of building
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-21 20:34 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries
>
> You could even install these locally perhaps to get what you need.
>
Unfortunately, all of the binaries available for
Darwin at the wiki are to
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-21 20:24
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries
You could even install these locally perhaps to get what you need.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44232
--- Comment #2 from Thomas dot L dot Clune at nasa dot gov 2010-05-21
19:58 ---
Thanks - yes I can upgrade. (But not quite as easily as I can report a bug,
apparently. :-) All of the systems I currently have access to only have
4.5.0, and some of those were quite recent installs, so
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-21 18:19 ---
Thanks for the bug report.
Can you upgrade to a newer version of the compiler?
bash-3.2$ gfortran -v -save-temps -c t.F90
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-apple-darwin8.10.1
Configured with: /tmp/gfortran-20090604/
15 matches
Mail list logo
