[Bug fortran/44646] [F2008] Implement DO CONCURRENT

2013-10-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1) > TODO as follow up: > * Implement type-spec support for "forall" and "do concurrent": > "(integer(8) :: i = 1:5:2)" > > * Try to make use of the constraints for

[Bug fortran/44646] [F2008] Implement DO CONCURRENT

2013-10-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Oct 24 16:30:22 2013 New Revision: 204023 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204023&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-24 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/44646 * trans-stmt.

[Bug fortran/44646] [F2008] Implement DO CONCURRENT

2013-08-27 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- Now that Aldy's/Jakub's OMP_SIMD patch (backend only) is in, r202029, - we can use it to annotate DO CONCURRENT loops. (The semantics should be the same - and match vector length of infinity.) For the usage,

[Bug fortran/44646] [F2008] Implement DO CONCURRENT

2011-09-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-08 06:38:17 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Sep 8 06:38:13 2011 New Revision: 178677 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178677 Log: gcc/fortran/ 2011-09-08 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/44646] [F2008] Implement DO CONCURRENT

2011-09-06 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-06 08:28:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > TODO as follow up: > > * Replace "Sorry" by a real implementation in trans-stmt.c Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-09/msg5.html > * Implemen

[Bug fortran/44646] [F2008] Implement DO CONCURRENT

2011-09-05 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-05 07:42:29 UTC --- Parser patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-09/msg2.html TODO as follow up: * Replace "Sorry" by a real implementation in trans-stmt.c Note: Needs support for MASK= as all

[Bug fortran/44646] [F2008] Implement DO CONCURRENT

2010-06-23 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot |