https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44696
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Known to fail|
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-29 19:06 ---
Subject: Bug 44696
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jun 29 19:06:07 2010
New Revision: 161554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=161554
Log:
2010-06-29 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-29 19:08 ---
Fixed with r161554. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-28 19:46 ---
The following variant also fails (without the ASSOCIATED statement being inside
a subroutine):
program rte1
implicit none
type::node_type
class(node_type),pointer::parent,child
integer::id
end type
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-28 20:02 ---
The fix for this bug turns out to be totally trivial:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c (revision 161504)
