[Bug fortran/44697] I/O testsuite failures: \r\n vs \n - gfortran.dg/ftell_3.f90

2010-07-20 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 04:25 --- Closing. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|AS

[Bug fortran/44697] I/O testsuite failures: \r\n vs \n - gfortran.dg/ftell_3.f90

2010-07-20 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 04:21 --- Subject: Bug 44697 Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Jul 21 04:20:58 2010 New Revision: 162362 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162362 Log: 2010-07-20 Jerry DeLisle PR libfortran/44697

[Bug fortran/44697] I/O testsuite failures: \r\n vs \n - gfortran.dg/ftell_3.f90

2010-07-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 20:01 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Kai, would you test this for me please. Kai wrote in IRC that he has tested it - and it worked well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44697

[Bug fortran/44697] I/O testsuite failures: \r\n vs \n - gfortran.dg/ftell_3.f90

2010-07-19 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 04:35 --- Kai, would you test this for me please. Index: ftell_3.f90 === --- ftell_3.f90 (revision 162291) +++ ftell_3.f90 (working copy) @@ -3,9 +3,10 @@ !

[Bug fortran/44697] I/O testsuite failures: \r\n vs \n - gfortran.dg/ftell_3.f90

2010-07-11 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-11 20:30 --- I will commit a similar patch, but I would like to add a check for the specific line ends to make sure we don't get a NULL character inserted some day. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug fortran/44697] I/O testsuite failures: \r\n vs \n - gfortran.dg/ftell_3.f90

2010-06-28 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-28 17:59 --- Yes, suggested patch works fine for me -- ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added