--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-02 13:19
---
Closing as fixed. Regarding comment #7. I do not see the problem on 4.5. I
reran tests here on my machine that failed with 4.6 and there were no failures
on 4.5
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-01 19:38 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> This appears to be fixed now from the commit of patch in #10.
Which is the commit:
Date: Sat Jul 31 21:37:25 2010
New Revision: 162788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-01 17:28
---
This appears to be fixed now from the commit of patch in #10. The related
failures showing in gcc test results are no longer there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 17:04
---
I see the problem with 4.4.3 as well. I think the patch in #10 is only masking
it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 16:28
---
I can see one here on a 32 bit machine. Moving string.h down in the file as
noted by David Edelsohn fixes it. I also changed the return type to void in
trans-io.c.
Index: inquire.c
=
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 15:11 ---
I can also reproduce it with -m32 and x86-64. The dump looks OK; if one uses a
debugger, one sees that in inquire_via_unit:
u->last_record == 0 - instead of the expect "5".
but u->flags.access == ACCESS_DIRECT as e
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 14:06
---
#7 confirms my suspicions. I will try to have a look into this in the next few
days. If anyone else has time, please do.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 09:32 ---
I see the same with -m32 on x86_64. Interestingly I see it with -O0
and libgfortran from 4.5 as well, so it looks like a frontend problem, not
a library problem to me.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 01:49
---
This is really odd because the patch does not touch these parts of the library,
at least for inquire_3.f90. I wonder if there is something latent here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-29 15:47 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> HJ, as it works on most systems, can you do some debugging?
Trunk was broken since yesterday and was fixed a while ago.
> a) Does the system has HAVE_TTYNAME defined for libgfortran/ ?
Y
10 matches
Mail list logo
