[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

2015-11-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

2013-06-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- From http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962#c20 Transformational intrinsics, done are: * all, any, count * product, sum * dot_product, matmul, transpose * pack,

[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

2013-06-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at

[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

2013-06-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

2013-06-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

2010-09-18 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-18 15:58 --- (In reply to comment #3) Am I correct to understand that the current situation (i.e. the error message) is a temporary fix for some missing gfc_simplify_*? If the error message you refer to is Error:

[Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

2010-09-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-16 13:09 --- MAXLOC and MINLOC are also missing (see pr25104). They are not, as there, afaik, are no simplifiers yet. Hence, with your patch they will be accepted, but you'd end up with wrong code at the end, as the