[Bug fortran/45715] [ABI cleanup] Move runtime parsing of I/O control list to front end

2019-03-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45715 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/45715] [ABI cleanup] Move runtime parsing of I/O control list to front end

2015-11-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45715 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45715] [ABI cleanup] Move runtime parsing of I/O control list to front end

2011-04-17 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45715 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||37577 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig

[Bug fortran/45715] [ABI cleanup] Move runtime parsing of I/O control list to front end

2010-09-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 06:54 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Here is a case where we do have to evaluate at run time. So maybe we can not > do what is proposed above. Well, I understood the request such that one passes a boolean for the 'YES' / 'NO'

[Bug fortran/45715] [ABI cleanup] Move runtime parsing of I/O control list to front end

2010-09-20 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 03:08 --- Here is a case where we do have to evaluate at run time. So maybe we can not do what is proposed above. character(10):: advancevar advancevar = "no" write(*, "(a)", advance=advancevar) "Well, " print *, "Does it