[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-03 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-02 19:52:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Ok, I think the only way this half-sentence and the interpretation on the J3 > mailing list make sense, is via the following interpretation. I disagree and

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INV

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 14:19:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Note: The problem not only applies to procedure pointers, but also to data > pointers, as the following example shows: Well, at least this example

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-02 11:33:43 UTC --- Summary as far I understand it. Cf. http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2010-September/003852.html : module m procedure(), pointer :: p, p2 protected :: p end module m subroutine

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:19 --- (In reply to comment #1) > TODO: Check whether the code is really invalid I have now asked at J3, cf. http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2010-September/thread.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:47 --- TODO: Check whether the code is really invalid - C551 talks only about nonpointers, but it also talks about "proc-target" - which only applies to procedures and the PROTECTED only applies per C549 to variables and pro