https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-30 13:52:44 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Oct 30 13:52:39 2010
New Revision: 166089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166089
Log:
2010-10-30 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin 2010-10-30
12:51:54 UTC ---
Another bug, we don't check that components are non-null before entering the
loop.
module type_a
type a
sequence
end type a
end module type_a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres
2010-10-30 11:52:46 UTC ---
> Can we find any test case which is sensitive to this change?
I di not find one in store!-(
Am I correct to expect that such test will be of the "reject valid" kind?
Clearly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-30 09:33:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I have successfully regtested the following patch
Thanks.
> I also noticed that the
> fix for pr46067 use the asymmetry of gfc_compare_interfaces
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bur...@net-b.de
--- Comment #8 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-29 08:31:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Meanwhile I am puzzled by the patch. My understanding of
> compare_type_rank and compare_type_rank_if is that these tests should be
> symmetric: tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-28
21:06:36 UTC ---
> Maybe you could check if there are any 'false alarm' errors among that ...
I'll do it. Meanwhile I am puzzled by the patch. My understanding of
compare_type_rank and compare_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28 15:32:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> With the patch in comment #2, several of my codelets are rejected: for
> instance
> the test in comment #24 of pr42274 is rejected with:
>
> [macb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-27
21:51:23 UTC ---
With the patch in comment #2, several of my codelets are rejected: for instance
the test in comment #24 of pr42274 is rejected with:
[macbook] f90/bug% gfc pr42274_5.f90
pr4227
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 11:58:15 UTC ---
Yes. Apparently a duplicate of PR 44917/44926.
14 matches
Mail list logo
