https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|mikael at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'll note that the ICE on comment 1 is gone since version 6, while comment 5
still ICEs with 9-trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-10-02 17:46:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 25397
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25397
updated patch for revision 179415
The patch in comment #12 no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #18 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-02
22:05:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 25400
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25400
the farthest I went about this pr
For what's worth, I have just unburied
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #16 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas
at gmail dot com 2011-02-21 08:25:51 UTC ---
Dear Mikael,
snip
Actually none of the gfc_compare_type/gfc_TK_compatible changes are absolutely
necessary to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
16:49:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23412
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23412
Patch, no regression modulo an error message change in null_1.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-20 20:49:44 UTC ---
I have applied the patch in comment #12 on top of revision 170344.
Patch, no regression modulo an error message change in null_1.f90
The error is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-20 22:01:54 UTC ---
(apparently this new feature is not tested in the test suite)
This wrong, there are several tests;-) The one that is missing is of the form:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
23:13:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Although I prefer the first form, if it is proven that it is too much work to
recover it, the second one requires only to adjust
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10
17:45:10 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Nov 10 17:44:58 2010
New Revision: 166547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166547
Log:
2010-11-10 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10
17:49:24 UTC ---
The commit fixes the issue mentioned in comment 7 to comment 9.
TODO: comment 0 to comment 6, i.e. the test cases of comment 0, comment 1 and
comment 5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-06
13:00:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
type b
sequence
class(a), pointer :: pa
end type b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-30 14:30:27 UTC ---
Related test case by Mikael, resulting in a segfault (PR 46196 comment #11):
module type_a
type a
sequence
end type a
end module type_a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-30 14:54:49 UTC ---
The buggy code in comment #0 is due to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=131238
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=131239
When looking for a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-30 15:04:29 UTC ---
The test case in comment #1 can be fixed by:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-30 15:11:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The test case in comment #1 can be fixed by:
Or better:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-30
16:03:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
The test case in comment #1 can be fixed by:
Or better:
Pre-approved.
22 matches
Mail list logo
