http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-06
09:25:28 UTC ---
> I am against implementing support for this => WONTFIX.
See
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Extensions-not-implemented-in-GNU-Fortran.html#Extensions-not-implemented-in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327
--- Comment #5 from Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-06 07:18:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> If they need to debug their code, then they should use Intel's debugger.
That is less comfortable for them than GDB.
(In reply to comment #4)
> Fortran c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl
2010-11-06 06:49:55 UTC ---
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:19:57PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:01:45AM +, jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
> wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2010-11-06 06:20:06 UTC ---
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:01:45AM +, jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil
> 2010-11-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-06 05:01:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hopefully, this will never be supported in gfortran.
The problem is users continue to use iFort and I have to continue supporting it
in GDB as they sources
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
