http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-09
16:40:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> crystal.fppized.f90 is micompiled.
If I compare 4.6.0 20100909 with today's GCC build for Tonto 2.3.1's
crystal.F90, one sees in the original dump that th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-09 14:48:46
UTC ---
crystal.fppized.f90 is micompiled.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-09
14:15:13 UTC ---
Another reason for the Tonto failure could be PR 45777.
I have now looked through the TRANSPOSEs of Tonto (cf. comment 11) - and I did
not see anything which looks as if it could go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-09
13:42:57 UTC ---
The following is wrongly compiled - however, it is not a regression as it
occurs since GCC 4.1. The solution is the same as for
gfc_trans_arrayfunc_assign, where the same issue can oc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-09
11:22:14 UTC ---
I fear that debugging this will be not easy - especially as to my knowledge
none of the gfortran developers has access to SPEC CPU 2006.
* * *
I tried
http://sourceforge.net/projec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-09 05:55:06
UTC ---
This patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01621.html
is the cause, which says
---
With this, the transpose optimization is back.
The two previous patches permitted to call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--
