https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2011-12-11 20:42:32
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Dec 11 20:42:23 2011
New Revision: 182210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182210
Log:
2011-12-11 Paul Thomas
Tobias Burnus
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-01
09:26:52 UTC ---
A variant is
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/dad37643dd8cd0c6
where the defined assignment has:
elemental subroutine assign (a, b)
class(ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-18
17:08:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The patch in comment #4 triggers two testsuite failures:
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/dummy_procedure_4.f90 -O (test for errors, line 28)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-18 16:27:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Here is a preliminary patch. Hope I got the logic right ...
The patch in comment #4 triggers two testsuite failures:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dummy_proce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
10 matches
Mail list logo