http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-19
20:44:27 UTC ---
> I know this is sort of a contrived case but seems that gfortran is getting
> confused in this case leading to syntactically invalid assembler.
I don't see the invalid assembl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2011-05-23 09:58:19 |2015-5-4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jun 6 16:12:39 2015
New Revision: 224190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/47359
* arith.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jun 6 16:16:03 2015
New Revision: 224191
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224191&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/47359
* ChangeLo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
