[Bug fortran/47523] Concatenation with deferred length character with lhs variable

2011-02-02 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523 --- Comment #6 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02 18:04:31 UTC --- Author: dnovillo Date: Wed Feb 2 18:04:21 2011 New Revision: 169697 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169697 Log: 2011-01-30 Paul

[Bug fortran/47523] Concatenation with deferred length character with lhs variable

2011-01-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-30 17:50:07 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 30 17:50:01 2011 New Revision: 169413 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169413 Log: 2011-01-30 Paul Thomas

[Bug fortran/47523] Concatenation with deferred length character with lhs variable

2011-01-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/47523] Concatenation with deferred length character with lhs variable

2011-01-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/47523] Concatenation with deferred length character with lhs variable

2011-01-28 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Wrong length in I/O |Concatenation

[Bug fortran/47523] Concatenation with deferred length character with lhs variable

2011-01-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28 21:04:40 UTC --- I think I/O is OK - the issue is probably the same as PR 47519: Mishandling of intrinsic operations. Though, this case looks a bit different than the other