http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-05
10:35:28 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Feb 5 10:35:24 2011
New Revision: 169850
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169850
Log:
2001-02-05 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-03 20:16:40 UTC ---
Further reduced test case
! { dg-do compile }
SUBROUTINE EXCH2_UV_AGRID_3D_RL( uPhi, vPhi, myNz )
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #6 from Martin Losch mlo...@uni-bremen.de 2011-02-02 09:00:10 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
As far as I can see (from the header files that came with pre-compiled
binaries) this was used:
#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING 2.4.1
#define
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #7 from Martin Losch mlo...@uni-bremen.de 2011-02-02 09:09:07 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #5)
I have had a look at the test code. Could you try
(1) to comment the call to EXCH2_UV_AGRID_3D_RL,
(2) the same for the (two?)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-02
09:35:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I have used gdb for minimally, but what is its use here? I cannot create an
executable if I do not reduce the optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
Martin Losch mlo...@uni-bremen.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23201|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #10 from Martin Losch mlo...@uni-bremen.de 2011-02-02 10:28:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #6)
I have used gdb for minimally, but what is its use here? I cannot create an
executable if I do not reduce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-02 11:22:39 UTC ---
This is embarrissing. I apologize for attaching another wrong file (the
correct
file name would have been exch2_uv_agrid_3d_rl.f). I have now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
Martin Losch mlo...@uni-bremen.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23200|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #3 from Martin Losch mlo...@uni-bremen.de 2011-02-01 17:30:56 UTC
---
gfortran -O3 -c exch2_uv_agrid_3d_rl.f
gives the same error
gfortran -O2 -c exch2_uv_agrid_3d_rl.f
works for this file (for others that are similar I need -O1).
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-01
18:32:44 UTC ---
I cannot reproduce it on x86_64-apple-darwin10 with all the options/versions I
have tried (including gcc version 4.6.0 20101106 (experimental) [trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-01
18:59:25 UTC ---
I have had a look at the test code. Could you try
(1) to comment the call to EXCH2_UV_AGRID_3D_RL,
(2) the same for the (two?) COMMONs,
and see if
15 matches
Mail list logo