http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #17 from John T 2012-06-26 15:07:48 UTC
---
Thank you for reminding me to submit a follow-up. Yes, blas and lapack test
cleanly with gcc and gfortran version 4.6.3.
I have since encountered a difficulty with the Octave program involv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #16 from Harald Anlauf 2012-06-25 20:26:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I just received a message saying:
>
> "The problem with the BLAS testing programs sometimes not computing the
> machine
> epsilon correctly has been fixe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
Cezary Sliwa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sliwa at blue dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #14 from John T 2011-02-18 16:58:45 UTC
---
Sorry for not responding sooner, had a health issue.
Here's the error message with the -static flag:
gfortran -g -o testieee tstiee.o
gfortran -fimplicit-none -g -static -O -c ilaver.f -o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-17
01:12:44 UTC ---
Always set LD_LIBRARY_PATH or another way is to compile with -static to make
sure the correct runtime functions get invoked.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #12 from Harald Anlauf 2011-02-16 18:01:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:56:05PM +, jrt at worldlinc dot net wrote:
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #11 from John T 2011-02-16 01:19:36 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:56:05PM +, jrt at worldlinc dot net wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
> >
> > --- Comment #6 from John T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf 2011-02-11 20:55:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I just found that some testcases still have the old problem
> of using the wrong threshold. cblat3.f tries to compute EPS
> and finds (see cblat3.out)
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #9 from Harald Anlauf 2011-02-11 20:24:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Interesting, I just built this a few days ago using trunk and ran make testing
> without any errors, but I had no optimization turned on. When I get back to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl
2011-02-11 20:23:14 UTC ---
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:56:05PM +, jrt at worldlinc dot net wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
>
> --- Comment #6 from John T 2011-02-11 19:56:02 UTC
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #6 from John T 2011-02-11 19:56:02 UTC
---
I built the reference BLAS included with Lapack from source. I just got the
results from blas_testing using gcc-4.4.5 and results good again. I don't know
where to find the raw results from l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #3 from John T 2011-02-11 00:42:13 UTC
---
I must be tired. Gotta work tonight. The GCC 4.6 is the 20110205 snapshot.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #2 from John T 2011-02-11 00:33:39 UTC
---
I should have included that this bug applies to a Mandriva 2008.1 Duron x86
system with kernel 2.6.24, libc 2.7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-11
00:28:28 UTC ---
What target are you running on?
18 matches
Mail list logo
