https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #12 from Salvatore Filippone
2011-09-14 15:02:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> relieved if Salvatore could tell us that his
> latest code still compiles with gfortran ...
>
> Cheers,
> Janus
Yes it does.
No (new) worries here
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-14 13:49:04 UTC ---
Hi Dominique,
> I am worried about your fix as it seems to break at least the original tests
> of
> pr41656 and pr41685:
thanks for noticing. But, from a quick glance, I w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-14 13:49:24 UTC ---
Hi Dominique,
> I am worried about your fix as it seems to break at least the original tests
> of
> pr41656 and pr41685:
thanks for noticing. But, from a quick glance, I w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #8 from Salvatore Filippone
2011-09-14 13:45:13 UTC ---
Duh!
My bad: all versions of scal are supposed to update the A dummy argument, which
should be INTENT(INOUT).
The test case in my original post is wrong in this respect
:(
Sa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #9 from Salvatore Filippone
2011-09-14 13:46:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
>
> The test case in my original post is wrong in this respect
>
I mean: in the original post for pr41656.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-14
13:31:15 UTC ---
Janus,
I am worried about your fix as it seems to break at least the original tests of
pr41656 and pr41685:
pr41656.f90:68.13:
procedure, pass(a) :: s_scal => s_coo_scal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-11 20:12:31 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Sep 11 20:12:24 2011
New Revision: 178767
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178767
Log:
2011-09-11 Janus Weil
PR fortran/3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-10 11:30:21 UTC ---
Relevant F08 standard quote:
4.5.7.3 Type-bound procedure overriding
1 If a specific type-bound procedure specified in a type definition has the same
binding name as a type-bou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #1 from Salvatore Filippone
2011-03-03 16:47:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 23534
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23534
test-case
13 matches
Mail list logo