http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-12
17:22:50 UTC ---
This one looks better:
Index: m4/ifunction_logical.m4
===
--- m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Revisi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-12
10:15:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> --- m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Revision 170320)
> +++ m4/ifunction_logical.m4 (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@
>src_kind = GFC_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-12
10:10:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Of course, the patch does not work as "dest" is not NULL ...
>
> I wonder whether a patch like the following would be correct.
Probably, although it might
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-12
09:38:18 UTC ---
Of course, the patch does not work as "dest" is not NULL ...
I wonder whether a patch like the following would be correct. One probably
needs to go through all the users of ifunction{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-11
11:28:57 UTC ---
Draft patch:
--- a/libgfortran/m4/ifunction.m4
+++ b/libgfortran/m4/ifunction.m4
@@ -132,7 +132,10 @@ name`'rtype_qual`_'atype_code (rtype * const restrict
retarray,
')dnl
define(ST
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-10
23:34:53 UTC ---
For completeness, the submitted asked at c.l.f whether the program is valid;
Richard Maine thinks so. (I concur ;-)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-10
23:19:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The "Bus error" seems fixed by the patch in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829#c32.
Well, it does not fix it, it just hides the problem: Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
11 matches
Mail list logo
