[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Oct 18 04:14:25 2016 New Revision: 241294 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241294=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-17 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/48298

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle --- The patch in comment 26 addressed the behavior of inquire(iolength= ) when derived types with User Defined procedures are in the Output List. The only other case I see not addressed yet is the size=

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Oct 16 16:29:46 2016 New Revision: 241216 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241216=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-16 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/48298

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #25 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Sep 26 11:15:23 2016 New Revision: 240493 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240493=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-26 Paul Thomas PR fortran/48298 *

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Sep 23 20:36:21 2016 New Revision: 240456 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240456=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-23 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #23 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Sep 22 11:26:59 2016 New Revision: 240349 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240349=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-22 Paul Thomas PR fortran/48298 *

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Walter Spector from comment #18) > Awesome! > > I have noticed one bug so far. The compiler is missing a check to see if > the arguments in the I/O procedures have the 'optional' attribute. It

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 39669 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39669=edit Revised patch for review/testing This revised patch speeds up execution on non DTIO internal units by saving and

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #20

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 7 21:21:16 2016 New Revision: 240032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240032=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-07 Dominique Dhumieres PR fortran/48298

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #18 from Walter Spector --- Awesome! I have noticed one bug so far. The compiler is missing a check to see if the arguments in the I/O procedures have the 'optional' attribute. It is allowing the attribute - even though it is

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 31 05:36:22 2016 New Revision: 239880 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239880=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-31 Paul Thomas Jerry DeLisle

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Walter Spector changed: What|Removed |Added CC||w6ws at earthlink dot net --- Comment

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 08:10:19PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Attached is an expanded test case. Could someone review and confirm this is > valid. I need to work some code in interface.c

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 36805 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36805=edit Expanded test case Attached is an expanded test case. Could someone review and confirm this is valid. I need to

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- As a volunteer, I simply do not have the time. I am not trying to imply any opinion pro or con regarding DTIO. The FORTRAN community as a whole needs to decide what is needed

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #9 from Damian Rouson damian at sourceryinstitute dot org --- Oh boy. I'm guessing that's an indication that there won't be any movement on this anytime soon. It seems this is one of only two major features missing for full Fortran

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #11 from Damian Rouson damian at sourceryinstitute dot org --- Thanks for the quick response. In recent times, I’ve had the impression that it’s harder to find developers than to find money (not that it’s all that easy to find

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #7 from Damian Rouson damian at rouson dot net --- Any updates on this PR? I'm teaching a graduate course on modern Fortran and will be using this feature in class. It would be great to have an open-source compiler that supports the

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org