[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-05-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04 19:18:04 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Wed May 4 19:18:01 2011 New Revision: 173392 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173392 Log: 2011-05-04 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-05-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-05-02 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-05-02 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 01:23:49 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Tue May 3 01:23:46 2011 New Revision: 173285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173285 Log: 2011-05-02 Steven G. Kargl PR fort

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-04-25 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-25 18:44:48 UTC --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg01986.html for a patch.

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-04-22 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl 2011-04-22 15:16:02 UTC --- On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 08:00:33AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:47:03PM +, jvdelisle at frontier dot com wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-04-22 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl 2011-04-22 15:00:50 UTC --- On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:47:03PM +, jvdelisle at frontier dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 > > --- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-04-22 Thread jvdelisle at frontier dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 --- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-04-22 12:46:16 UTC --- On 04/21/2011 09:08 PM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: --- snip --- >> >> I think we are not handling the 'q' as any more than an exponent marker. 'e' >> works just as w

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-04-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-04-21 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot |

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-04-21 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 --- Comment #1 from Cezary Sliwa 2011-04-21 22:33:36 UTC --- Sorry, I almost forgot: $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/gcc/4.6.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-redhat-linux