[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

2011-04-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

2011-04-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-30 12:00:53 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sat Apr 30 12:00:50 2011 New Revision: 173214 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173214 Log: 2011-04-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/48462 P

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

2011-04-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-30 11:46:34 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sat Apr 30 11:46:31 2011 New Revision: 173213 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173213 Log: 2011-04-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/48746 *

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

2011-04-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-30 11:12:29 UTC --- Hi Paul, the least I can do is to supply you with a more complete test case :-) program main implicit none integer, parameter :: m=4, n=3, count=2 double precision :: a(m, coun

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

2011-04-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-29 20:26:59 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Fri Apr 29 20:26:56 2011 New Revision: 173185 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173185 Log: 2011-04-29 Paul Thomas PR fortran/48462 *

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

2011-04-28 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-28 10:52:51 UTC --- The problem is that matmul calls size0, which depends on correct rank information in the dtype field. Should be easy enough to fix by adding a default initializer for the dtype field,

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

2011-04-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-27 15:07:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Problem here is that the return array "dtype" field is uninitialized when > > lhs is (unallocated) allocatable. Due to this ther

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

2011-04-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

2011-04-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|