https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #21 from Domi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|burnus at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #20 from Mikael Morin 2012-08-02
19:48:55 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Aug 2 19:48:50 2012
New Revision: 190098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190098
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/48820
* trans-array.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-01
10:35:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> TODO:
> 1. Remaining issues of assumed-rank, e.g. shape/ubound/lbound,
>class-to-type handling, contiguous attribute.
And INTENT(OUT) handling, cf.
ht
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus 2012-07-21
11:02:56 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jul 21 11:02:47 2012
New Revision: 189743
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189743
Log:
2012-07-21 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus 2012-07-20
06:23:46 UTC ---
Status: Now also assumed-ranks are supported.
TODO:
1. Remaining issues of assumed-rank, e.g. shape/ubound/lbound,
class-to-type handling, contiguous attribute.
2. Update/relax
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus 2012-07-20
05:56:41 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jul 20 05:56:37 2012
New Revision: 189700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189700
Log:
2012-07-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-08
07:19:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Re-reading the standard, I think the non-BIND(C) version of TYPE(*) is
> currently mishandled. That should be only visible for "TYPE(*)" dummies which
> ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-07
09:26:13 UTC ---
Re-reading the standard, I think the non-BIND(C) version of TYPE(*) is
currently mishandled. That should be only visible for "TYPE(*)" dummies which
are INTENT(OUT) and where the actu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||32630
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-03
18:56:01 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Mar 3 18:55:57 2012
New Revision: 184863
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184863
Log:
2012-03-03 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-03
14:11:34 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Mar 3 14:11:24 2012
New Revision: 184856
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184856
Log:
2012-03-03 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-03
08:40:36 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Mar 3 08:40:24 2012
New Revision: 184852
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184852
Log:
2012-03-03 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-01
19:07:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created attachment 26799 [details]
> Patch for TYPE(*)
Just a warning to testers: I have the impression that for scalar allocatables
and pointers, the wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-01
09:23:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 26799
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26799
Patch for TYPE(*)
Patch for TYPE(*). The patch should be feature complete (i.e. everything should
wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #6 from Walter Spector 2012-02-29
15:58:10 UTC ---
Tobias,
If you are interested, I tried the patch you posted on the email list to a
freshly checked out trunk. After building the compiler, I tried the following
small test case:
mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Walter Spector changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w6ws at earthlink dot net
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-27
18:51:38 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri May 27 18:51:31 2011
New Revision: 174348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174348
Log:
2011-05-27 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-06
18:33:36 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri May 6 18:33:31 2011
New Revision: 173503
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173503
Log:
Really commit:
2011-05-06 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-06
18:12:29 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri May 6 18:12:25 2011
New Revision: 173500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173500
Log:
2011-05-06 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48
24 matches
Mail list logo
