[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Actually, a future gfortran patch might again disable the support for the code in comment 0 (original bug report) by doing interface checks. That's not only in line with my

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Mon May 20 20:03:48 2013 New Revision: 199118 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199118root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Mon May 20 20:05:40 2013 New Revision: 199119 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199119root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Mon May 20 20:08:05 2013 New Revision: 199120 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199120root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 Juno Krahn juno.krahn at nih dot gov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juno.krahn

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-25 15:37:35 UTC --- For a (vaguely) related issue, see PR 53478.

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 22:14:15 UTC --- See also discussion starting at http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2008-December/002123.html Fortran 2003 has in 16.1 Scope of global identifiers Program

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 22:15:51 UTC --- *** Bug 35161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic,

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-24 19:56:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Tobias, did comment #4/#5 implement #35161? No. The original issue of this PR and of PR 35161 is unfixed. (I think they are

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 14:17:45 UTC --- The OPTIONAL problem is solved by allowing OPTIONAL with -std=gnu (default) and -std=f2008tr. Regarding the original problem: I think I have convince myself

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-06 18:12:29 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri May 6 18:12:25 2011 New Revision: 173500 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173500 Log: 2011-05-06 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-06 18:33:36 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri May 6 18:33:31 2011 New Revision: 173503 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173503 Log: Really commit: 2011-05-06

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #3 from Bill Long longb at cray dot com 2011-05-04 22:40:31 UTC --- On 5/4/11 3:28 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 (In reply to comment #1) [BIND(C) with OPTIONAL arguments]

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #1 from Bill Long longb at cray dot com 2011-05-03 21:51:29 UTC --- As an aside, the code in the Description is a work-around to avoid using the TR 29113 feature that allows Optional arguments. This would be the preferred code in the