https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at archaeologic dot
codes
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-11
16:52:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Still in 4.6.1, using original test case.
Well, that's the reason that this PR is not closed.
Fixed (in 4.6 and 4.7-trunk): Deep copy of array constructo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
Joshua Cogliati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.1
--- Comment #11 from Joshua Cogli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-17
06:11:35 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 17 06:11:31 2011
New Revision: 175137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175137
Log:
2011-06-17 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/493
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-14
13:07:07 UTC ---
(Comment fixed 8 fixed the missing deep copy.)
Regarding the reallocate (cf. comment 6, but using scalars to reduce the dump
size): For
type t
integer, allocatable :: A
end ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-11
22:08:49 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jun 11 22:08:46 2011
New Revision: 174959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174959
Log:
2011-06-12 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4932
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-10
12:45:13 UTC ---
Submitted patch, which fixes - except of RESHAPE - the issue of comment 0 and
comment 3:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-06/msg00095.html
TODO: See comment 6: Namely, for realloc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-10
08:35:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The following should partially help
It does - but it also leads to two test suite failures:
gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_5.f90 - failure around line 53.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-09
22:22:39 UTC ---
The following should partially helps: It solves the segfault for
z(:) = [ x, y ]
and does a deep copy.
TODO:
- I miss a freeing of the components of the LHS, there is currently just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong result with |Deep copy missing for array
10 matches
Mail list logo