https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
--- Comment #12 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: lkrupp
Date: Wed Jan 18 21:41:48 2017
New Revision: 244601
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244601&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-18 Louis Krupp
PR fortran/50069
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
--- Comment #11 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com ---
You're right. I wasn't paying attention to the third ("function reverse ...")
in the bug report.
I believe that's fixed with the attached patch to trans-expr.c along with my
other patch. I no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The attached patch adds a slight variation of Tobias Burnus's patch
> for 50069 to my patch for 55086, and it seems to fix the two tests in 50069.
I have applied the patch without the last hunk. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
--- Comment #9 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com ---
The attached patch adds a slight variation of Tobias Burnus's patch for 50069
to my patch for 55086, and it seems to fix the two tests in 50069.
"make check-fortran" runs with no surprises.
Lou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
--- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Still in 5.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
zmi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zmi007 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from zmi -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Still on gfortran 5.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.1 |4.8.0
--- Comment #4 from Vitt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-08-17
08:44:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Draft patch:
This patch fails for gfortran.dg/forall_12.f90 test (of PR31217 and PR33811):
character(LEN=12) :: a(2) = "123456789012"
forall (i = 3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
13 matches
Mail list logo