[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2020-05-28 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #23 from Vittorio Zecca --- The update proposed in comment #18 fixed the issue. Thank you!

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2020-05-28 Thread markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2020-05-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83b84b6ef84ffc0ca25aef5c91720d8f82212a5c commit r8-10280-g83b84b6ef84ffc0ca25aef5c91720d8f82212a5c Author: Mark Eggleston

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2020-05-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c575cd2e0089cf2fcb11ffb7899e5fd472b3780c commit r9-8631-gc575cd2e0089cf2fcb11ffb7899e5fd472b3780c Author: Mark Eggleston

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2020-05-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e2c7f9a29c212db4bf428799a2d62f79f392511 commit r10-8196-g4e2c7f9a29c212db4bf428799a2d62f79f392511 Author: Mark

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2020-05-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7fd43c38f7469a3ef5ee30e889d60e1376d4dfc commit r11-665-ga7fd43c38f7469a3ef5ee30e889d60e1376d4dfc Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2018-05-11 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #17 from Jürgen Reuter --- Sorry, I don't want to generate unnecessary traffic, I'm just scrolling thru old c.l.f. discussions and stumble over some old reports there from time to time.

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2018-05-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This gives in ICE now with the current trunk, while it just shows > an error message for a "Deleted feature" when using -std=f95. Confirmed from at least 4.8 up to trunk (9.0).

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2018-05-11 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2017-05-15 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #14 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:57:37PM +, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 > > --- Comment #13 from Vittorio Zecca --- > Steve, you know why I do not like

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2017-05-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #13 from Vittorio Zecca --- Steve, you know why I do not like you. If you are so sensitive please take care of the sensitivity of people submitting bugs and do not call them "idiot". But this is not relevant here. What is relevant

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2017-05-15 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:27:04PM +, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote: > > --- Comment #11 from Vittorio Zecca --- > You still around, Steven? > I cannot say I missed you. I've never left, and you're

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2017-05-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #11 from Vittorio Zecca --- You still around, Steven? I cannot say I missed you. Nobody asked me to apply those fixes, I imagined that Tobias Burnus, their author, would try them and eventually apply them. It seems that it did not

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2017-05-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2017-05-14 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #9 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still in 7.1.0 and in trunk 8.0.0! Will it ever be fixed?

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2016-04-28 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #8 from Vittorio Zecca --- ICE still in 5.3.0

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2013-08-24 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com --- Still in gfortran 4.8.1. In trans-stmt.c:105 len = GFC_DECL_STRING_LEN (se.expr); the pointer se.expr-decl_common.lang_specific is NULL. Thus causing the segmentation fault.

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2013-04-16 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.7.0 |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2011-09-14 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2011-09-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2011-09-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-14 16:08:16 UTC --- Patch: --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c @@ -1264,9 +1265,7 @@ gfc_get_symbol_decl (gfc_symbol * sym) TREE_USED

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2011-09-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-14 16:40:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Patch: I have accidentally submitted the patch before testing finished. It does not work. The problem is that it does create the

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

2011-09-14 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---