https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
--- Comment #43 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #42)
> The following patch does the magic (not regtested):
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
> index 8daa7bb8d06..0a995ec3ae7 100644
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
--- Comment #42 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #41)
> In my working tree I had the following patch
This still ICEs on comment#23 z1.
Slightly rewriting that case, one gets a reasonable error mes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
--- Comment #41 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
In my working tree I had the following patch
--- /opt/gcc/_clean-svn//gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c 2020-01-05
11:44:35.0 +0100
+++ /opt/gcc/work-cvs/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c 2020-01-05 11:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
--- Comment #37 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Fixed in 10.1.1.
