https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
--- Comment #9 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Intel ifort and ifx accept the test case without errors.
They both accept
pointer pi
integer :: pi=>null()
and
integer :: pi=>null()
pointer pi
Anyway, it's easy to transfom it into
integer, pointer ::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markeggleston at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
--- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Sorry about that, long time I did not blush, I'll try to remember the lesson.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Bug still present in 7.3.0 and trunk 258946.
While closing PRs that have been fixed is very useful, making noise about PRs
marked as NEW is a waste of time for everybody.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Bug still present in 7.3.0 and trunk 258946.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|janus a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> Here is a simple patch to accept the code in comment 0:
... which unfortunately introduces a large amount of ICEs in the testsuite,
e.g. on bounds_check_7.f90:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
10 matches
Mail list logo