[Bug fortran/51520] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64

2012-03-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/51520] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64

2012-01-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #4 from Tob

[Bug fortran/51520] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64

2011-12-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-12-13 12:49:31 UTC --- > At least I hope for some smaller patch than the big constructor patch (Rev. > 181425). Sadly enough, this pr has been fixed by r181425 (r181424 gives the ICE).

[Bug fortran/51520] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64

2011-12-13 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-13 09:18:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > valgrind output: > ==18442==by 0x52BD26: traverse_ns (symbol.c:) (In reply to comment #1) > The ICE seems to have been fixed on trunk between revisi

[Bug fortran/51520] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64

2011-12-13 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug fortran/51520] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64

2011-12-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|