[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2016-11-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org Tar

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-02-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-02-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-01 19:06:11 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Feb 1 19:06:07 2012 New Revision: 183808 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183808 Log: 2012-02-01 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/5

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-01-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-31 22:27:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > I somehow missed comment 5 The ICE is fixed by the patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00277.html However, I believe that test case is valid

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-01-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-01-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-01-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-31 18:41:57 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Jan 31 18:41:47 2012 New Revision: 183771 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183771 Log: 2012-01-31 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/52

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-01-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-28 20:41:28 UTC --- With the patch in comment #4 I get [macbook] f90/bug% gfc pr52024.f90 pr52024.f90:46.6: use m_test 1 Error: 'i_equal_t' and 't_equal_i' for GENERIC '==' at (1) are am

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-01-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-01-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-28 09:51:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > While for GENERIC, one calls in resolve.c's check_generic_tbp_ambiguity: > if (gfc_compare_interfaces (sym1, sym2, sym2->name, 1, 0, NULL, 0)) > > The INT

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-01-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

2012-01-27 Thread fmartinez at gmv dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 --- Comment #1 from Fran Martinez Fadrique 2012-01-27 21:56:34 UTC --- Created attachment 26484 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26484 Test case driver