http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02
13:21:00 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Mar 2 13:20:52 2012
New Revision: 184785
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184785
Log:
2012-03-02 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325
--- Comment #7 from Jos de Kloe kloedej at knmi dot nl 2012-03-02 13:50:59
UTC ---
Thanks for your (really) fast response and fix.
I'll keep my eye open for other details that might improve gfortran.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02
14:59:05 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Mar 2 14:58:58 2012
New Revision: 184790
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184790
Log:
2012-03-02 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-21
15:58:23 UTC ---
Submitted patch (pending review):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-02/msg00089.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-02-22 06:49:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Submitted patch (pending review):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-02/msg00089.html
OK ;-)
this would be a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-02-22 06:53:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Submitted patch (pending review):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-02/msg00089.html
and a nitpick... it
