http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #8 from Dominique
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-03-21 08:48:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > What was the motivation for this hashing scheme, BTW? Linkers already
> > support
> > 1) long symbol names (I read somewhere
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-20
10:58:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> What was the motivation for this hashing scheme, BTW? Linkers already support
> 1) long symbol names (I read somewhere that OpenOffice has symbols up to 4000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-03-20 10:27:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Indeed, one can construct examples which exceed the length: Namely module
> procedures or module variables. The problem is that GFC_MAX_MANGLED_SYMBOL_LEN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
--- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2012-03-16
23:18:26 UTC ---
Someting as trivial as the following would perhaps already help (not tested):
Index: match.c
===
--- match.c(revi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
