[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2013-03-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2013-01-16 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher 2013-01-16 22:27:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > PR fortran/52865 > * trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_do): Put countm1-- before conditional > and use value of countm1 before the decrement in

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2013-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 16:05:42 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 16 16:05:27 2013 New Revision: 195241 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195241 Log: PR fortran/52865 * trans-stmt.

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2013-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 11:59:29 UTC --- Created attachment 29178 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29178 gcc48-pr52865.patch This untested patch makes the loop vectorizable. Not sure if it is be

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2013-01-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2013-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 10:47:18 UTC --- BTW, does Fortran have well defined number of iterations if say a do loop goes from (unknown to compiler): integer :: i, m, n m = huge(0) - 7 n = huge(0) - 2 do i =

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2013-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2013-01-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2013-01-15 Thread izamyatin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bur...@net-b.de, izamyatin

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2012-04-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

2012-04-04 Thread izamyatin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #1 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-04-04 13:27:11 UTC --- Created attachment 27088 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27088 C test