[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2017-06-27 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2017-06-27 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Jun 28 04:14:32 2017 New Revision: 249719 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249719&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-06-27 Jerry DeLisle Backport from trunk PR l

[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2017-05-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #8) > Fixed on trunk. If this is important enough we could backport to 7. Any > opinions? I'd say yes.

[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2017-05-29 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on trunk. If this is important enough we could backport to 7. Any opinions?

[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2017-05-29 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon May 29 19:17:57 2017 New Revision: 248577 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248577&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-05-29 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran/53029 * li

[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2017-05-28 Thread manfred99 at gmx dot ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 --- Comment #6 from Manfred Schwarb --- Will do tomorrow. Thanks for your patch, I hadn't seen your comments here when I wrote my comment to bug 35339 ... We had seemingly the same association when reading nicolas' patch.

[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2017-05-28 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- The patch regression tested OK. Manfred can you test for yourself? At least on this test case we are getting biggly better!

[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2017-05-28 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org A

[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2015-10-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2012-05-11 Thread manfred99 at gmx dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 Manfred Schwarb changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/53029] missed optimization in internal read (without implied-do-loop)

2012-05-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|