https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 37733
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37733&action=edit
Fix for 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||george at gly dot bris.ac.uk
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
--- Comment #15 from Pat Haugen 2013-02-01
16:10:09 UTC ---
The recently added switch, -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations, can be used to
prevent the transformation into an infinite loop.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl
2012-04-25 13:32:26 UTC ---
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:46:03AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Thus, the -fcheck=bounds error seems to be appropriate. The question is what
> we
> do about x(2). While
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl
2012-04-24 14:49:18 UTC ---
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:57:43AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
>
> Richard Guenther changed:
>
>What|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-24
09:29:10 UTC ---
A "fix" would be for example
Index: gcc/expr.c
===
--- gcc/expr.c (revision 186757)
+++ gcc/expr.c (working copy)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-24
09:17:23 UTC ---
I think http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-07/msg00307.html is also referencing
it too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-24
09:14:57 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-09/msg02301.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-24
08:38:43 UTC ---
Found the discussion:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00079.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |fortran
--- Comment #6 from Richard Gu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |fortran
--- Comment #3 from Richard Gu
16 matches
Mail list logo