http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #17 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-04
19:06:15 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Feb 4 19:06:06 2013
New Revision: 195730
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195730
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/54195
* r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #16 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-04
18:34:42 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Feb 4 18:34:30 2013
New Revision: 195729
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195729
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/54107
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-02
12:13:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I'm inclined to test and submit both,
They break class_20.f03. Fixed with this (reverts partially patches for
pr44044 and pr48112):
diff --git
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-02
11:15:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> typedef struct
> {
> + gfc_try resolve_cached_result;
> + unsigned resolved:1;
> +
>/* Variable attributes. */
resolve_cached_result
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-02
11:07:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > The `gfc_namespace' struct has a `resolved' attribute. Maybe we can use it?
>
> Not sure. I was thinking that we ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-11 14:29:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > For comment #8, resolve_typebound_intrinsic_op is called twice: Once for the
> > base type 'nc', and once fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 09:47:17 UTC ---
For comment #8, resolve_typebound_intrinsic_op is called twice: Once for the
base type 'nc', and once for the extended type 'ncb'.
A crude way to avoid this is the f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 21:23:20 UTC ---
Apparently comment #0 has been fixed by
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=193568
which applied the patch of comment #5. However, the test case in co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20 09:45:15 UTC ---
A similar test case (also a regression) was reported by Andrew Benson at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-08/msg00101.html:
module gn
implicit none
type :: nc
con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-07 22:05:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Will start a full regtest now ...
Completed successfully.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-07 21:21:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> However: Witout the patch, the code guarded by the IF statement above is
> called
> twice (which leads to the error). But with the patch, it is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-07 20:23:26 UTC ---
My first attempt to fix it would be something like this:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/reso
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-07 18:12:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The changelog lists only one entry in that period, namely:
>
> Author: janus
> Date: Wed Jun 27 17:38:00 2012
> New Revision: 189022
Yeah, I knew
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-07
16:47:10 UTC ---
It works with the snapshot GCC 4.8.0 20120624 and fails with the one from
20120701.
The changelog lists only one entry in that period, namely:
Author: janus
Date: Wed Jun 27 17:38:00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
20 matches
Mail list logo
