https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Oct 31 19:59:04 2016
New Revision: 241720
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241720&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-31 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/54679
* io.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679
--- Comment #5 from Nick Maclaren ---
That's the right message. Warning or error, it doesn't matter.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I should have looked at this sooner. We actually do diagnose this, but our
warning/error logic is not right.
pr54679.f90:8:56:
PRINT "(A,1X,I2,1X,A,1X,I2,1X,A,2(1X,I0,1X),A,2(1X,L0,1X))"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679
--- Comment #1 from Nick Maclaren 2012-09-23 12:19:00
UTC ---
Please reduce the severity to trivial, and change it to "Confusing
diagnostic"! It's my error, at root, but gfortran could do better.
I had forgotten the relevant constraint
