[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 09:33:00 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 12 09:32:52 2012 New Revision: 194438 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194438 Log: PR fortran/55633 * tree-ssa-lo

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2012-12-11 02:00:11 UTC --- Created attachment 28921 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28921 Tree dump Looks to me like things go bad in lim1.

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin 2012-12-11 01:29:00 UTC --- Created attachment 28920 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28920 Reduced testcase

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-10 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-11 01:16:16 UTC --- On 10-Dec-12, at 11:29 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 > > --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek > 2012

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-10 16:29:10 UTC --- The test is really large, I guess it would be useful if you could try to reduce the testcase as long as it still fails that BIT_SIZE(integer(8)) test. Or can you step through

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-10 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-10 13:31:31 UTC --- On 10-Dec-12, at 3:57 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Can you pin-point which version causes the regression? At this point, I onnly know the test didn't f

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|-

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-10 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C