[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #13 from Jouko Orava --- (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #12) > I'm wondering if you had a working patch at some point. Not a comprehensive one, no. I recall modifying libgfortran/runtime/memory.c was not sufficient. I

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 Jouko Orava jouko.orava at iki dot fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jouko.orava at iki

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- My hardware selection is very limited, but if someone wishes to test the possibilities on other hardware, I'd be happy to clean up my benchmarking code. I can do the

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #10 from Jouko Orava jouko.orava at iki dot fi --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) I can do the testing on darwin (intel d10 and d13, ppc d9). That would be very much appreciated. I've put a tarball and some

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #11 from Jouko Orava jouko.orava at iki dot fi --- Just in case there are users who encounter this bug report, here is the single-file workaround. Save the following as nosegfault.c, and follow the instructions in the comments. It can

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thatcadguy at gmail

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09 13:30:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) posix_memalign unfortunately has a weird enough interface that we can't easily extract

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09 13:38:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) posix_memalign unfortunately has a weird enough interface that we

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09 16:09:25 UTC --- As __float128 is outside of the scope of C/C++, this is not a bug on the C library side. It might be outside the scope of C/C++ but doesn't C99

[Bug fortran/55916] Alignment issues with real(16) on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-01-09 20:57:13 UTC --- On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916 --- Comment #5