http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #12 from Fred Krogh fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com 2013-03-17
15:35:10 UTC ---
For those using valgrind on gentoo for the first time (like me) you need to add
to FEATURES in make.conf, splitdebug and re-emerge glibc.
I've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #13 from Fred Krogh fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com 2013-03-17
16:40:22 UTC ---
As perhaps you have already guessed, this is just me being confused. After
removing a lot of stuff from the code, I inserted a print statement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #1 from Fred Krogh fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com 2013-03-16
18:02:49 UTC ---
I realize this is not much help for a bug report. I can't get a small test
case to fail, and if I change the optimization level it works. Also,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-16
18:16:10 UTC ---
What happens if you don't use the graphite options '-floop-strip-mine
-floop-block'?
How big is your small test case and on which libraries does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #3 from Fred Krogh fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com 2013-03-16
18:46:06 UTC ---
First some confusion. If I single step over the first statement it works
properly. Once past that confusion, deleting both -floop-block and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #5 from Fred Krogh fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com 2013-03-16
21:25:46 UTC ---
I don't mean to be argumentative, but I would like to ask:
Would an index out of bounds explain why single stepping over the statement
make it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-16
21:36:54 UTC ---
I don't mean to be argumentative, but I would like to ask:
Would an index out of bounds explain why single stepping over the statement
make
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #7 from Fred Krogh fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com 2013-03-16
21:44:46 UTC ---
As mentioned in my first post, I am compiling with -fcheck-bounds. The errors
are occurring in a subroutine inside what at the moment is a main
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-16
23:03:06 UTC ---
I was posting
in the hope that I might help someone in finding a compiler bug.
And we do appreciate that very much.
The problem is that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #9 from Fred Krogh fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com 2013-03-17
04:42:39 UTC ---
I have tried, but the small examples I've tried all work. And the code uses a
library that I am not free to pass on. Probably you just have to
14 matches
Mail list logo
