http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57987
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57987
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, so eventually I have posted the patch to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00074.html
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57987
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57987
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Uh oh, but I do not really feel comfortable submitting a patch like
this that I do not understand at all but happens to pass the testsuite :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57987
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30558
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30558action=edit
An unsuccessful attempt to fix this
I attempted to fix this with the attached patch but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57987
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Comment on attachment 30558
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30558
An unsuccessful attempt to fix this
+ if (!has_coarray_vars || gfc_option.coarray ==
